OSP rejects claims US immigration court dismissed charges against Ofori-Atta

0

The Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) has dismissed reports suggesting that a United States immigration court found criminal charges against former Finance Minister Kenneth Nana Yaw Ofori-Atta to be lacking credibility.

‎‎In a statement issued on Tuesday, the OSP said it had taken note of media reports and a publication attributed to a Ghanaian law firm claiming that Mr Ofori-Atta had been granted permanent residency in the United States following an immigration court finding that the criminal charges brought against him by the OSP were not credible.

‎The anti-corruption agency clarified that it is not involved in any immigration proceedings concerning Mr Ofori-Atta in the United States and therefore could not comment on matters relating to his residency status.

‎‎According to the OSP, its involvement in the case is limited to extradition proceedings being pursued through the Attorney-General, who serves as Ghana’s central authority in such matters.

‎‎“The extradition packet is not before the immigration court,” the OSP stated, adding that the question of whether the criminal charges against Mr Ofori-Atta are credible can only be determined by Ghanaian courts, which have the legal jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter.

‎The Special Prosecutor’s office further stressed that any assessment of Mr Ofori-Atta’s guilt or innocence remains the exclusive responsibility of the courts in Ghana.

‎‎The statement also underscored that Mr Ofori-Atta remains a citizen of Ghana despite reports of his permanent residency status in the United States.

‎‎“As such, he remains amenable to extradition to Ghana if so decided by the extradition court in the United States,” the OSP noted.

‎‎The clarification comes amid growing public interest in the legal proceedings involving the former Finance Minister, who is facing criminal charges filed by the OSP as part of ongoing investigations.

‎The OSP’s statement seeks to separate the ongoing extradition process from any immigration-related proceedings in the United States, insisting that the two matters are distinct and should not be conflated.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here